| | |  | AM/FM Antennas | Home » » » » Terk Technology AF9330 AM/FM Antenna Tower | | | | | | | Description: | | The affordable high performance AM-FM antenna / Adjustable gain amplifier / Air Coil technology | | | Features: | |
• Two antennas in one ? It can function either as an omnidirectional antenna for great reception from all directions and from distant or weak stations
• Adjustable built-in amplification for optimum signal clarity
• Superb performance is further enhanced by unique Air Coil technology which electrically isolates AM and FM elements
• Dimensions - 17H x 3W x 3-1/2D
• Included accessories - AC/DC power adapter, 75 ohm to 300 ohm transformer, 75 ohm F connector to 75 ohm screw-type connector
| | | Product Details: | | | Product Length:
| 13.8 inches | | Product Width:
| 4.8 inches | | Product Height:
| 5.6 inches | | Product Weight:
| 1.5 pounds | | Package Length:
| 17.0 inches | | Package Width:
| 4.9 inches | | Package Height:
| 3.7 inches | | Package Weight:
| 1.6 pounds | | Average Customer Rating:
| based on 30 reviews |
| | | | Customer Reviews: | |
Average Customer Review:
( 30 customer reviews )
Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
81 of 82 found the following review helpful:
Almost completely uselessOct 12, 2004
By Doug W.
"twinular"
I was fooled. I thought, "Oh, a vertically polarized, amplified antenna ought to work pretty well, at least a little better than the antenna built into the power cord of my tabletop radio." Well, folks, it doesn't. In a few minutes, you can make a very simple passive dipole antenna (i.e., a hunk of wire, basically) with a piece of 300-ohm flat twin-lead wire (you know, the stuff that's flat with two wires about a 1/4" apart in molded plastic...goes for about a dime a foot) that works better for FM. I know because I did a side-by-side comparison between the Terk and my homebrew dipole...the dipole pulled in the station I wanted in stereo while the Terk antenna could only get me a noisy mono signal at any gain setting. As a radio hobbyist (licensed ham radio operator), I am ashamed to admit that I fell for this one, so please don't tell anyone.
27 of 27 found the following review helpful:
Doesn't work at allAug 16, 2004
By M. Speechley Terrible. Tried several positions (flat and upright), nothing seemed to improve reception. May as well not have been plugged in at all. Let's say the 1 star is for the lighted green dial on the front, since I can't give it zero stars...
29 of 30 found the following review helpful:
don't waste your moneyJan 05, 2004
By cleverer doesn't work for me - i live an hour north of boston and an hour south of portland - not the best area for reception but the little wire antenna that came with my stereo works a lot better than this
18 of 19 found the following review helpful:
Never try...Nov 13, 2003
By ilgiz erkin I bought this antenna for get better receive.But the one meter wire works better than this.Does not make any differance if you connect to power or not.I dont recomend to any one.
6 of 6 found the following review helpful:
If I could give this a zero, I wouldDec 25, 2008
By luconline I bought this antenna today, because I was trying to improve the FM reception for certain of my favorite stations, without resorting to listening to them online, or spending lots of money getting HD radio. Well, this isn't even worth the plastic it's made of. I've never written a review on Amazon, but I don't want anyone to waste their money buying this. After fiddling with the antenna for a few hours, I decided to cannibalize another FM antenna wire (the cheap ones that come with a receiver), joining them together to make the one I'm using twice as long. Cost? $0.10 if I'm being generous. Result? Perfect. No static, no problems. Why buy this worthless thing? This antenna is going back to the store.
See all 30 customer reviews on Amazon.com
| | |
|